Re: [PATCH] test-lib: stricter unzip(1) check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 11:20:19AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Stepping back a bit, why do we even care if "unzip -a" works on
>> "../$zipfile" and converts things correctly in that check_zip() test
>> in t5003 in the first place?  It looks more like a test on "unzip"
>> than making sure we correctly generate a zip archive to me...
>
> I think it is testing that we generated an archive with the correct "I
> am text" flags so that an unzip implementation can do the
> auto-conversion.

Yes, I understand that.  I was hoping for a response along the lines
of "we want to make sure we mark text as text, and 'zip -l' has an
option to let us check the attributes without having to actually
checking things out" ;-)


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]