Hi Eric,
On Fri, 15 Jul 2016, Eric Sunshine wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 11:30 AM, Johannes Schindelin
> <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > When reporting broken links between commits/trees/blobs, it would be
> > quite helpful at times if the user would be told how the object is
> > supposed to be reachable.
> >
> > With the new --name-objects option, git-fsck will try to do exactly
> > that: name the objects in a way that shows how they are reachable.
> > [...]
> > Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx>
> > ---
> > diff --git a/builtin/fsck.c b/builtin/fsck.c
> > @@ -576,6 +598,7 @@ static struct option fsck_opts[] = {
> > OPT_BOOL(0, "lost-found", &write_lost_and_found,
> > N_("write dangling objects in .git/lost-found")),
> > OPT_BOOL(0, "progress", &show_progress, N_("show progress")),
> > + OPT_BOOL(0, "name-objects", &name_objects, N_("show verbose names for rechable objects")),
>
> s/rechable/reachable/
>
> > OPT_END(),
> > };
Thanks, as always, for a set of extra sharp eyes. Will be fixed in the
next iteration.
Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html