Re: [PATCH] pretty: add format specifiers: %gr, %gt, %gI, gi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Theodore Ts'o <tytso@xxxxxxx> writes:

>> I'm on the fence, so I'll let you decide how you want to proceed. I can
>> live with "%gr" and "%gt", as they are at least symmetric with their
>> author/committer counterparts.
>
> I'm on the fence myself.  I can live with either, since either way the
> long message command line will be going in .gitconfig.  I have a
> slight preference for %gr and %gt, as %gT isn't orthogonal with
> %ad/%cd, but I could be easily pursuaded otherwise.
>
> Does anyone else have a strong opinion?

I am fine with %gr/%gt, with the understanding that the step beyond
that would not be to add %gT but to do %(reflog:...), and giving
similar longform to other things like %ad so that we can move things
in the "maybe cumbersome to type but more readable" direction.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]