Re: [PATCH 4/5] date: document and test "raw-local" mode

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 01:06:17AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> 
> The documentation claims that "raw-local" does not work. It
> does, but the end result is rather subtle. Let's describe it
> in better detail, and test to make sure it works (namely,
> the epoch time doesn't change, but the zone does).

Maybe add an editorial statement that in most cases this isn't
particularly useful?  Documenting raw-local implies that someone might
want to consider using it, and it's not clear to me folks should ever
try --- they're more likely to confuse themselves more than anything
else.

					- Ted
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]