Re: [PATCH v2 11/17] am: counteract gender bias

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Junio,

On Thu, 7 Jul 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> 
> >> I doubt this kind fo distraction is desirable in the middle of a
> >> seriously heavy series like this one.  As a standalone clean-up to
> >> turn these directly to "their" that everybody would agree on and can
> >> be merged down quickly to 'master' that does not have to keep the
> >> body of the main topic waiting for the dust to settle might be a
> >> better approach.
> >>  ...
> > I am really curious, though. Has it not been our practice to encourage
> > preparatory patches like white-space or const fixes as part of patch
> > series that touch a certain part of the code that needed fixing?
> 
> Yes, isn't that "preparatory clean-up" what I said "might be a
> better approach"?

What I meant by "preparatory clean-up" is a patch in the patch series,
just as I had it.

Now it is a separate patch "series".

Ciao,
Dscho
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]