Re: reflogs and worktrees?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 5:07 PM, Johannes Schindelin
<Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Duy,
>
> ever since I started working extensively with worktrees, I end up with
> these funny gc problems, like broken links and stale reflogs.

Yeah we have problem with gc not traversing all worktree refs. I had
something that could fix it temporarily [1] but the decision was to
wait for refs code to support new "worktree storage" so that we can
walk worktree refs properly, then fix gc [2]. We should get pretty
close to that point after [3] lands.

[1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/295961/focus=296076
[2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/295961/focus=296219
[3] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/296409

> Is it maybe possible that the reflogs (which are per-worktree now) are not
> traversed completely when gc'ing (which is *not* per-worktree)?
-- 
Duy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]