Re: [PATCH 2/2] t3404: add a test for the --gpg-sign option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

>> that has a substring '-S"' in it to ensure that the codepath to
>> parse --gpg-sign= on the command line of "rebase", and to the
>> message we see here are working correctly, without actually checking
>> if GPG is invoked at all, or if it is invoked the key given by the
>> option is correctly passed to the invocation?
>
> Exactly. I want to test --gpg-sign even when there is no gpg executable
> available.

The other side of that coine is that even when GPG is available, we
do not see if it is invoked correctly at all.  That was what I found
disturbing.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]