Re: [PATCH v4] Refactor recv_sideband()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 29 Jun 2016 at 18:40:16, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Lukas, can you see what is in 'pu' after I push out today's
> integration result in several hours and tell us if you like the
> result of the SQUASH??? change?

Looks good to me. Thank you both for working on this. Note that you
should amend the last paragraph of the original commit message when you
squash Nicos patch into mine.

Oh, and one more detail: I wonder why we still use fwrite(), now that we
know we can use xwrite() which guarantees atomicity. Is there a reason
for that?

Regards,
Lukas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]