Re: [PATCH 2/2] color: support "italic" attribute

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> We already support bold, underline, and similar attributes.
> Let's add italic to the mix.  According to the Wikipedia
> page on ANSI colors, this attribute is "not widely
> supported", but it does seem to work on my xterm.
>
> We don't have to bump the maximum color size because we were
> already over-allocating it (but we do adjust the comment
> appropriately).
>
> Requested-by: Simon Courtois <scourtois@xxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  Documentation/config.txt | 2 +-
>  color.c                  | 8 ++++----
>  color.h                  | 3 ++-
>  t/t4026-color.sh         | 4 ++--
>  4 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/config.txt b/Documentation/config.txt
> index 58673cf..4b97d8d 100644
> --- a/Documentation/config.txt
> +++ b/Documentation/config.txt
> @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ color::
>         colors (at most two) and attributes (at most one), separated

This is describing the format accepted by color_parse_mem(), whose
main loop has /* [fg [bg]] [attr]... */ comment in front?

Is "at most one" still correct, or it was already stale before this
patch?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]