Re: [PATCH 2/2] Define a few built-in attribute rules.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> On Sat, 14 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> [...] if we really wanted to, we could introduce a way to explicitly say 
>> "Even if the contents do not look like text, apply line ending 
>> conversion, always", by redefining the meaning of 'crlf' attribute.
>
> I think it might make more sense to introduce a way to say "do not even 
> check; I _know_ that I want crlf on these".

You said I wanted to say in the message in clearer words.  We
are in agreement.

Also the comments to the two patches in this series you sent are
valid; I reworked them before merging to 'next' and pushing them
out yesterday, but I think the Makefile thing still remains.
Will fix up.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]