Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] grep: fix grepping for "intent to add" files

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

>>> If cached is false and ce_ita() is true and either CE_VALID or
>>> CE_SKIP_WORKTREE is set, we would continue to grep an _empty_ SHA-1.
>>> But I think we should grep_file() instead, at least for CE_VALID.
>>
>> Yes, that is the breakage I noticed in the patch under discussion
>> and that I wanted to fix in the "I wonder if a better change would
>> be..." version.
>
> Heh.. I did guess that. Since neither solution is complete, I'm in
> favor of Charles's and assume that i-t-a forces to ignore CE_SKIP and
> CE_SKIP_WORKTREE. I could wait for people to come back complaining,
> then we know there are real users in very obscure cases and will fix
> it then.

I said something that can be misunderstood.  I meant "I wonder if ..."
version is correct.  Charles's has the bugs you mentioned and I
wanted to fix them by sending the "I wonder if..." version out.

But you seem to have misread my statement as "A bug is in my version
and I want to fix that bug in my version".  That is not what I
meant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]