Junio C Hamano wrote: > I agree that "the name of the file" can be interpreted in many ways, > and I agree that it would be a good idea to find a better phrase to > name the path that is being worked on, but I do not think "the file > in the git repository" is that phrase. > I think using the word "path" somewhere in the updated description > is more likely to have the effect you desire. "path" is also very ambiguous. I see that "tracked" is often used to describe what %f is, so how about: + Note that "%f" is the name of a file tracked by Git. Depending on the + version that is being filtered, the corresponding file on disk may not + exist, or may have different contents. So, smudge and clean commands should + not try to access the file on disk. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature