On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 5:22 PM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think the documentation should be updated either way. This is not > about the ordering in the status table, but rather about the order of > the real operations. The user may care about that ordering if they want > to know what races are possible Good point. > or what would happen if the packfile > fetch failed (we'd already have deleted the old refs, but wouldn't fetch > the new ones). Off topic, but this sounds like a bug to me. We could have kept ref update more consistent (maybe at some point we could even do atomic transaction update for all refs if there's a need for it). -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html