Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] t9001: non order-sensitive file comparison

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 06/08/2016 06:09 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Samuel GROOT <samuel.groot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

Actually we had issues when trying to refactor send-email's email
parsing loop [1]. Email addresses in output file `commandeline1` in
tests weren't sorted the same way as the reference file it was
compared to. E.g.:

  !nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx!
  !author@xxxxxxxxxxx!
  !one@xxxxxxxxxxx!
  !two@xxxxxxxxxxx!

And the reason why these addresses that are collected from the same
input (i.e. command line, existing e-mail fields, footers, etc.) are
shown in different order in your implementation is...?

It's not shown in different order in our implementation, it's just a leftover of my refactor attempt [1].

Maybe it's a bad idea to increase tests' complexity, but IMHO tests should be independent to the addresses' order.

Plus, it would help refactor in the future, the data being processed differently: parsing and processing in different subroutines rather than doing everything in one gigantic loop.

We can drop it if necessary, but it may be useful to make git-send-email.perl easier to maintain.

[1] * http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/295753
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]