Re: Some index-base bug in "next" branch ("git-applymbox"-related?)..

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Thu, 12 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> 
>> This will teach applymbox the index base safety, but it shows
>> that the division between applymbox and applypatch makes things
>> less efficient than how git-am can do the same.
>
> Hey, I'd happily use git-am too..
>
> If you want to deprecare git-applymbox, why don't you just make it an 
> alias for git-am, potentially doing the defaults and command line argument 
> conversion?

I'd rather not.

The whole reason I did not _enhance_ git-applymbox but wrote a
separate git-am was because I found git-applymbox's command line
parameter quite insane and felt that supporting it at the same
time doing a saner command line parameter was too much kludge.


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]