"Philip Oakley" <philipoakley@xxxxxxx> writes: > Given that clarification I'd be happier to go with it being one's > 'Publish' repo. > > My initial reticence was because of the association of "publish" with > vanity publishing and other forms of over-sharing and self promotion. > > A clarification/explanation that calling it a 'publish' repo is about > granting access, and possible open access, would make it more > acceptable. I think "publish" is the best we found up to now. -- Matthieu Moy http://www-verimag.imag.fr/~moy/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html