Re: [PATCH] cvsserver: Document the GIT branches -> CVS modules mapping more prominently

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 12, 2007 at 03:05:51PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> Frank Lichtenheld <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > Add a note about the branches -> modules mapping to LIMITATIONS because
> > I really think it should be noted there and not just at the end of
> > the installation step-by-step HOWTO.
> >
> > I used "git branches" there and changed "heads" to "branches" in
> > my section about database configuration. I'm reluctant to replace
> > all occourences of "head" with "branch" though because you always
> > have to say "git branch" because CVS also has the concept of
> > branches. You can say "head" though, because there is no such
> > concept in CVS. In all the existing occourences of head other than
> > the one I changed I think "head" flows better in the text.
> 
> Ah, I tend to agree.  Mind if I applied only the first hunk then?

Not at all. Go ahead.

Gruesse,
-- 
Frank Lichtenheld <frank@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]