Mike Hommey <mh@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > From my POV, the desired outcome from this patch series is that there is > no change of behavior, and Torsten's fix makes > git://[example.com:123]:/path/to/repo urls handled the same before and > after the patch series. OK. I somehow suspect nobody cares too much about what happens to the <scheme>://[<string>] syntax where [<string>] is not an IPv6 literal, but if a rewrite is meant to be a rewrite, it is very good that you two are aiming for bug-to-bug compatible behaviour. Can we have a final submission to be queued? I'd rather not to squash things in to a topic that I wasn't heavily involved in its review discussion. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html