Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] completion: add git status

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> I know not everybody will the "natural thing" I claim, and if it were
> easy to support everywhere, I don't mind doing it. But I suspect
> (without thinking very hard on it) that it would make those case
> statements a bit harder to read and maintain.

Oh, I agree with that 100%.  I didn't mean to suggest (let alone to
demand) to support the possible truncations.

I simply was hoping that Thomas would respond with your "For a user
who uses tab completion, it is natural to use --unt<TAB> so by the
time we use find-on-command-line, we can expect the fully-spelled
form" when I asked about "--unt=no"; that would give us a warm and
fuzzy confirmation that the patch author has thought things through
when designing the new feature.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]