On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 6:45 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Current mark_reachable_objects() only marks objects from index from > _current_ worktree as reachable instead of all worktrees. Because this > function is used for pruning, there is a chance that objects referenced > by other worktrees may be deleted. Fix that. > > Small behavior change in "one worktree" case, the index is read again > from file. In the current implementation, if the_index is already > loaded, the index file will not be read from file again. This adds some > more cost to this operation, hopefully insignificant because > reachability test is usually very expensive already. Could this extra index read be avoided by taking advantage of 'struct worktree::is_current'[1] and passing the already-loaded index to add_index_objects_to_pending() if true? Or, am I misunderstanding the issue? [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/292194 > Reported-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@xxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > diff --git a/reachable.c b/reachable.c > @@ -155,6 +156,32 @@ int add_unseen_recent_objects_to_traversal(struct > +static void add_objects_from_worktree(struct rev_info *revs) > +{ > + struct worktree **worktrees, **p; > + > + worktrees = get_worktrees(); > + for (p = worktrees; *p; p++) { > + struct worktree *wt = *p; > + struct index_state istate; > + > + memset(&istate, 0, sizeof(istate)); > + if (read_index_from(&istate, > + worktree_git_path(wt, "index")) > 0) > + add_index_objects_to_pending(revs, 0, &istate); > + discard_index(&istate); > + } > + free_worktrees(worktrees); > + > + /* > + * this is in case the index is already updated but not > + * written down in file yet, then add_index_... in the above > + * loop will miss new objects that are just created or > + * referenced. > + */ > + add_index_objects_to_pending(revs, 0, &the_index); > +} -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html