Re: [PATCH 5/6] Teach "fsck" not to follow subproject links

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <junkio@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>>>
>>> The small detail in the last step is wrong, though.  Even if
>>> they EXIST, they may be isolated commits that are note connected
>>> to refs, and fsck in the repository would not have warned about
>>> unreachable trees from such unconnected commits.
>>
>> The superproject *is* a ref.
>
> But when you fsck the subproject repository in isolation in the
> earlier step in your procedure, that is not taken into account,
> is it?

Ah, forget about this.  The HEAD, which is in the tree of the
higher-level project, is a ref.  Silly me.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]