Re: [PATCH 0/2] strbuf: improve API

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



William Duclot <william.duclot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> This patch series implements an improvment of the strbuf API, allowing
> strbuf to use preallocated memory. This makes strbuf fit to be used
> in performance-critical operations.
> 
> The first patch is simply a preparatory work, adding tests for
> existing strbuf implementation.
> Most of the work is made in the second patch: handle pre-allocated
> memory, extend the API, document it and test it.

Seems interesting, however do you have any test/example that would
show the difference of performance between using these optimizations
and not using them?

Such values would make a nice addition to help convince people that
your series is interesting to have and use.

Thanks,
Rémi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]