Re: [PATCH 19/21] t9003: become resilient to GETTEXT_POISON

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@xxxxxxx> writes:

> Alternatively, we could leave sed alone as it were before this patch and
> use test_i18ngrep instead of grep to fake success under GETTEXT_POISON.
> I think I prefer this way. What do you think?

That is equivalent to saying that "we would translate 'lgf' to
end-user's language", which does not make much sense to me.

Wouldn't the introductory explanation, up to "Did you mean this?",
be the only thing that is translated?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]