Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] pathspec labels [WAS: submodule groups]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> Hmph, why not?
>
> We need a namespace for which
> * we can guarantee that it is for labeling purposes only (even in the future)
> * is obvious to the user to be a labeling name space
>
> Starting with "label" offers both?

Ah, of course.  I thought that you were trying to limit ":(attr:<attribute>)"
magic only to attributes that begin with "label-", which is where my
"why not?" comes from.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]