[PATCH v2 04/12] attr.c: explain the lack of attr-name syntax check in parse_attr()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 attr.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/attr.c b/attr.c
index 4ae7801..05db667 100644
--- a/attr.c
+++ b/attr.c
@@ -183,6 +183,12 @@ static const char *parse_attr(const char *src, int lineno, const char *cp,
 			return NULL;
 		}
 	} else {
+		/*
+		 * As this function is always called twice, once with
+		 * e == NULL in the first pass and then e != NULL in
+		 * the second pass, no need for invalid_attr_name()
+		 * check here.
+		 */
 		if (*cp == '-' || *cp == '!') {
 			e->setto = (*cp == '-') ? ATTR__FALSE : ATTR__UNSET;
 			cp++;
-- 
2.8.2-748-gfb85f76

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]