Re: [PATCH v2 52/94] builtin/apply: read_patch_file() return -1 instead of die()ing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 3:56 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 9:17 AM, Christian Couder
> <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> To libify `git apply` functionality we have to signal errors to the
>> caller instead of die()ing. Let's do that by using error() instead
>> of die()ing in read_patch_file().
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/builtin/apply.c b/builtin/apply.c
>> @@ -445,10 +445,10 @@ static void say_patch_name(FILE *output, const char *fmt, struct patch *patch)
>> -static void read_patch_file(struct strbuf *sb, int fd)
>> +static int read_patch_file(struct strbuf *sb, int fd)
>>  {
>>         if (strbuf_read(sb, fd, 0) < 0)
>> -               die_errno("git apply: failed to read");
>> +               return error("git apply: failed to read: %s", strerror(errno));
>
> When Duy's nd/error-errno series, which is in 'next', gets promoted to
> 'master', then this could become:
>
>     return error_errno(...);

Yeah, sure.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]