Re: [PATCH] Windows: only add a no-op pthread_sigmask() when needed

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:

> So I guess that you're preferring my 2. above. Going on that assumption, I
> will send out another iteration.

OK.

>> Also is
>> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-gnulib/2015-04/msg00068.html
>> relevant?  Does /mingw64/x86_64-w64-mingw32/include/ implement "macro
>> only without function"?
>
> Yes, it has that problem. Do we care, really?

Not really.  I was curious how actively this area is evolving;
knowing that would help me judge pros-and-cons between your 1 & 2
above.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]