Re: [PATCH 3/6] Add 'resolve_gitlink_ref()' helper function

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 4/10/07, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Can't a subproject be bare?

Not when it is checked out, no. That's what "checked out" means ;)

If a subproject is bare, it never gets resolved, because it's never
checked out in a superproject.

So a subproject *can* be bare, but when it's bare it is just a totally
regular independent git project, simply by *definition* of not being
checked out inside a superproject.

But hey, that was just a design decision of mine, and if people can argue
for it being wrong, I don't think I'm married to it ;)

I didn't actually had a use case in mind as I asked it.
After a bit of thinking I could imagine a repo which is
used for integration exclusively (no compilation or looking
at the files at all).
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]