Yaroslav Halchenko <yoh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On Fri, 06 May 2016, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote: > >> Dear Git Folks, > >> Originally this issue was mentioned in previous thread [1], and I have decided >> to bring it into a separate thread. ATM there is a dichotomy in git behavior >> between cloning non-bare repos: if I clone over ssh or just locally by >> providing url without trailing /.git, git senses for /.git and works just fine >> with ssh or local repositories, but fails for "dummy" http ones, the demo >> script is here [2] which produces output listed below. From which you can see >> that cloning using http URL to the repository without /.git fails (git version >> 2.8.1, Debian). As it was noted in [1], concern could have been to not >> traverse website since could lead to dangerous places. But .git is under >> originating url directory, as well as info/ or HEAD or any other object >> accessed by git, so IMHO this concern is not a concern. I am afraid that the reason why you saw no response is primarily because nobody is interested in extending dumb commit-walker HTTP transport after the world has largely moved on and abandoned it. The necessary update to the client might as simple as using $GIVEN_URL/.git/ and attempting the request again after seeing the probe for $GIVEN_URL/info/refs fails. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html