Re: [PATCH 0/6] modernize t1500

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> This series modernizes t1500; it takes an entirely different approach
>>> than [1][2] and is intended to replace that series.
>>
>> Turns out that it wasn't so painful after all.
>>
>> The only small niggle I have is on 6/6; my preference would be,
>> because once we set up .git we do not add objects and refs to it, to
>> make a copy a lot earlier before the tests start.
>
> -- >8 --
> Subject: [PATCH 7/6] t1500: finish preparation upfront
>
> The earlier tests do not attempt to modify the contents of .git (by
> creating objects or refs, for example), which means that even if
> some earlier tests before "cp -R" fail, the tests in repo.git will
> run in an environment that we can expect them to succeed in.
>
> Make it clear that tests in repo.git will be independent from the
> results of earlier tests done in .git by moving its initialization
> "cp -R .git repo.git" much higher in the test sequence.
>
> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---

I think the same logic applies to other preparatory things like
creation of sub/dir in the working tree etc.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]