Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
> Hi Junio,
>
> On Mon, 9 May 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>
>> Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@xxxxxx> writes:
>>
>> > This is a heavily version of patches we carried in Git for Windows for
>
> s/patches/patched/
>
> I wish I had a penny for each time I wrote this particular typo.
This is a heavily version of patched we carried...
does not sound all that grammatical.
These are heavily modified version of patches...
is a possibility, but perhaps you meant
This is a heavily patched version of what we carried...
>> OK, so what do you want me to do with this "heavily modified
>> version"? Earlier you responded:
>>
>> > I have a huge preference for a code that has been production for
>> > years over a new code that would cook at most two weeks in 'next'.
>>
>> I agree. However, it does not fill me with confidence that we did not
>> catch those two bugs earlier. Even one round of reviews (including a
>> partial rewrite) was better than all that time since the regressions
>> were introduced.
>>
>> So do we want to follow the regular "a few days in 'pu' in case
>> somebody finds 'oops this trivial change is needed', a week or two
>> in 'next' for simmering as everybody else, and finally down to
>> 'master'" schedule?
>
> Well, I plan to include this patch (replacing the original
> version) in whatever Git for Windows version I release next. I
> guess that we can go with the regular way in git.git. You could
> just as well merge it to master right away, it won't matter much
> as far as Git for Windows is concerned.
OK.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html