Re: [PATCH] t6302: simplify non-gpg cases

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Karthik Nayak <karthik.188@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, May 9, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Should we cite bc9acea (ref-filter: implement %(if), %(then), and
>> %(else) atoms, 2016-04-25) here as an example of a commit for which
>> this was problematic (and which indeed broke the tests when GPG is
>> unavailable)?
>
> But it's still in pu and I'll be re-rolling it, would that be acceptable?

Ah right, therefore, no reason to cite that particular commit. Peff's
description is fine as-is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]