On 07/05/16 14:15, Ramsay Jones wrote:
>
>
> On 07/05/16 13:19, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Torsten Bögershausen <tboegi@xxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> The "seq" is not understood by all shells,
>>> using printf fixes this,
>>>
>>> index 20a3ffe..48d964e 100755
>>> --- a/t/t6044-merge-unrelated-index-changes.sh
>>> +++ b/t/t6044-merge-unrelated-index-changes.sh
>>> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ test_description="merges with unrelated index changes"
>>> # Commit E: renames a->subdir/a, adds subdir/e
>>>
>>> test_expect_success 'setup trivial merges' '
>>> - seq 1 10 >a &&
>>> + printf 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 >a &&
>>
>> $ printf 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10
>> 1
>
> yep, I think:
>
> printf "%d\n" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 >a &&
>
> would be equivalent.
>
Having said that, there is also 'test_seq' which you can use
to avoid portability problems (although it uses perl, so could
be viewed as a bit heavyweight):
test_seq 1 10 >a &&
ATB,
Ramsay Jones
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html