Re: [PATCH 11/10] allow forcing index v2 and 64-bit offset treshold

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 9 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx> writes:
> 
> > This is necessary for testing the new capabilities in some automated 
> > way without having an actual 4GB+ pack.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@xxxxxxx>
> > ---
> >
> > I should write some tests... when I have more time.
> 
> It appears everybody is short of time.  I am having two
> troubles.  Nobody seems to have positive nor negative reports or
> comments on what are cooking in 'next' so nothing can graduate,
> and I am behind list discussions on certain areas myself.

At least my latest patch series received two positive reviews.  ;-)

> > ddiff --git a/t/Makefile b/t/Makefile
> 
> ???

Remnant of a change to that file which was later reverted but mtime 
doesn't match the index.


Nicolas
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]