Re: /* compiler workaround */ - what was the issue?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2016-05-06 02:54 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:

I wonder if can we come up with a short and sweet notation to remind
futhre readers that this "initialization" is not initializing but
merely squelching warnings from stupid compilers, and agree to use
it consistently?

Perhaps

	#define COMPILER_UNINITIALIZED_WARNING_INITIALIZER 0

or, for short-and-sweet

	#define CUWI 0

?

:)

		M.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]