On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I may have rushed to judgement. wrap-for-bin.sh has always been the >> dependency for bin-wrappers/*. If we force that file to change, then >> bin-wrappers/* will be recreated when switching branches. So how about >> this? > > I do not think you are "force updating wrap-for-bin" in any way in > the patch, though. You are building it in such a way that it does > not have to get updated within the revision that contains e6e7530 > (assuming that this will be queued directly on top it and merged to > everywhere e6e7530 is contained). Yep. > The new case/esac looks somewhat bad (its knowing that where test-* > lives, test-* is the only thing that is special, etc. troubles me at > the same time that case/esac is funnily formated). We could just make some random changes in this file. That would have the same effect. > Where does "@@PATH@@" come from and who rewrites it? Is that a > misspelt "@@PROG@@"? Yep. Should have run make distclean before testing :( -- Duy -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html