Re: [PATCH v8 10/10] ce_compare_data() did not respect conversion

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 29.04.16 23:09, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Well, didn't I do exactly the above much earlier and discarded it
> because that breaks the definition of "diff"?  Or is this doing
> something differently?

Yes, and I try to sneak it in anyway ;-)

I spend some time debugging how to get t6038 passed, and need
some more time.

If 10/10 is a no-go (and it probably should be),
does it make sense to keep 1/10..4/10 and discard 5..10 for the moment ?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]