Re: [PATCH 25/29] refs: resolve symbolic refs first

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2016-04-27 at 18:57 +0200, Michael Haggerty wrote:
+retry:
...
> +		if (--attempts_remaining > 0)
> +			goto retry;

could this be a loop instead of using gotos?

> +			/*
> +			 * There is a directory in the way,
> +			 * but we	 don't know of any references
> +			 * that it should contain. This might
> +			 * be a directory that used to contain
> +			 * references but is now empty. Try to
> +			 * remove it; otherwise it might cause
> +			 * trouble when we try to rename the
> +			 * lockfile into place.
> +			 */
> +			strbuf_addf(err, "there is a non-empty directory '%s' "
> +				          "blocking reference '%s'",
> +					  ref_file.buf,refname);
> +			goto error_return;

We don't actually try to remove anything here, so that comment seems
wrong?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]