Re: [PATCH 53/83] builtin/apply: make find_header() return -1 instead of die()ing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 9:33 AM, Christian Couder
<christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> To be compatible with the rest of the error handling in builtin/apply.c,
> find_header() should return -1 instead of calling die().
>
> Unfortunately find_header() already returns -1 when no header is found,
> so let's make it return -2 instead in this case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Couder <chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/builtin/apply.c b/builtin/apply.c
> @@ -1588,18 +1596,18 @@ static int find_header(struct apply_state *state,
>                                 continue;
>                         if (!patch->old_name && !patch->new_name) {
>                                 if (!patch->def_name)
> -                                       die(Q_("git diff header lacks filename information when removing "
> -                                              "%d leading pathname component (line %d)",
> -                                              "git diff header lacks filename information when removing "
> -                                              "%d leading pathname components (line %d)",
> -                                              state->p_value),
> -                                           state->p_value, state->linenr);
> +                                       return error(Q_("git diff header lacks filename information when removing "
> +                                                       "%d leading pathname component (line %d)",
> +                                                       "git diff header lacks filename information when removing "
> +                                                       "%d leading pathname components (line %d)",
> +                                                       state->p_value),
> +                                                    state->p_value, state->linenr);
>                                 patch->old_name = xstrdup(patch->def_name);
>                                 patch->new_name = xstrdup(patch->def_name);
>                         }
>                         if (!patch->is_delete && !patch->new_name)
> -                               die("git diff header lacks filename information "
> -                                   "(line %d)", state->linenr);
> +                               return error("git diff header lacks filename information "
> +                                            "(line %d)", state->linenr);

I realize that the caller in this patch currently just die()'s, and I
haven't looked at subsequent patches yet, but is this new 'return'
going to cause the caller to start leaking patch->old_name and
patch->new_name which are xstrdup()'d just above?

>                         patch->is_toplevel_relative = 1;
>                         *hdrsize = git_hdr_len;
>                         return offset;
> @@ -2115,6 +2123,9 @@ static int parse_chunk(struct apply_state *state, char *buffer, unsigned long si
>         int hdrsize, patchsize;
>         int offset = find_header(state, buffer, size, &hdrsize, patch);
>
> +       if (offset == -1)
> +               exit(1);
> +
>         if (offset < 0)
>                 return offset;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]