Re: [PATCH 1/5] t1000: fix case table.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 7 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> Case #10 is not handled with unpack-trees.c:threeway_merge()
> internally, unless under the agressive rule, and it is not a
> bug.  As the test expects, ND (one side did not do anything,
> other side deleted) case was meant to be handled by the caller's
> policy (e.g. git-merge-one-file or git-merge-recursive).

Looks like I neglected to update (or remove) that table; 
Documentation/technical/trivial-merge.txt agrees with your change.

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]