Hi Chris, On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Christian Couder wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Christian Couder > <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 5:23 PM, Ramsay Jones > > <ramsay@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > >> > >> On 24/04/16 14:33, Christian Couder wrote: > >>> This is a patch series about libifying `git apply` functionality, and > >>> using this libified functionality in `git am`, so that no 'git apply' > >>> process is spawn anymore. This makes `git am` significantly faster, so > >>> `git rebase`, when it uses the am backend, is also significantly > >>> faster. > >> > >> I just tried to git-am these patches, but patch #78 did not make it > >> to the list. > > > > That's strange because gmail tells me it has been sent, and it made it > > to chriscool@xxxxxxxxxxxxx. > > Instead of waiting for the patch to appear on the list, you might want > to use branch libify-apply-use-in-am25 in my GitHub repo: > > https://github.com/chriscool/git/commits/libify-apply-use-in-am25 Thanks for this. In particular with longer patch series, I find mail-based patch submissions *really* cumbersome, not only on the submitter's side but also on the consumers' side. I wonder, however, why you use numbers in the branch name to version things? I thought Git allowed for more advanced versioning than that... :-) Ciao, Dscho -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html