Hi Luk, On Sun, 24 Apr 2016, Luke Diamand wrote: > On 24 Apr 2016 08:19, "Johannes Schindelin" <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > Hi Lars & Junio, > > > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Junio C Hamano wrote: > > > > > Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > Thanks for the explanation. My intention was not to be offensive. > > > > I was curious about your workflow and I was wondering if the > > > > Travis CI integration could be useful for you in any way. > > > > > > Don't worry; I didn't feel offended. The Travis stuff running on > > > the branches at http://github.com/git/git would surely catch issues > > > on MacOSX and/or around git-p4 (neither of which I test myself when > > > merging to 'pu') before they hit 'next', and that is already helping > > > us greatly. > > > > I agree that it helps to catch those Mac and P4 issues early. > > > > However, it is possible that bogus errors are reported that might not have > > been introduced by the changes of the PR, and I find it relatively hard to > > figure out the specifics. Take for example > > > > https://travis-ci.org/git/git/jobs/124767554 > > > > It appears that t9824 fails with my interactive rebase work on MacOSX, > > both Clang and GCC versions. I > > That test is failing because git-lfs has changed its output format and > git-p4 had not yet been taught about this. > > There's a patch from Lars to fix it - see the mailing list for details. Yeah, thanks, Gábor provided me with the link. Ciao, Johannes