Re: [PATCH] name-rev: include taggerdate in considering the best name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> ... I think this is still the simplest model we can use
> without trying to really do a topo-sort. And in many ways it's the
> simplest one to explain to people too: "we try to use the oldest
> reference we can find as a base for the resulting name" is not a
> complex or hard concept to explain.

Yes, the more I look at Dscho's patch, the more like it exactly for
that reason.  Its behaviour is very simple from the end-user's point
of view, unlike the historical one.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]