Re: history damage in linux.git

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> That commit aed06b9 can also be described as
>
>     v3.13-rc7~9^2~14^2~42
>
> so describing it as 'v4.6-rc1~9^2~792' is clearly not closer in any way.

I seem to recall that name-rev had an unexplained heuristics to
strongly avoid following second parent changes (I see two ^2 in the
path from 3.13-rc7 above).

> However did git decide to use that further-away name? That looks odd.
>
> I'm wondering if it's because of the new root commit we have, and that
> confuses the distance calculation somehow? That came in somewhat
> recently (mid March) with the GPIO pull.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]