Re: Timestamp of zero in reflog considered invalid

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 5, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks for a report.

Thanks for looking into it!

> I think this dates back to 883d60fa (Sanitize for_each_reflog_ent(),
> 2007-01-08):
>
> commit 883d60fa97c6397450fb129634054e0a6101baac
> Author: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx>
> Date:   Mon Jan 8 01:59:54 2007 +0100

Ah yes, I tracked it to this too--forgot to mention that, sorry.

> I suspect that there was some
> confusion as to how strtoul() signals an error condition when the
> commit was written, or something.

Yep--the next line *did* check for (!message) which would indicate
that strtoul failed, but checking for errno==ERANGE sounds good.  +1
on the patch modulo setting errno = 0 first.

Thanks,
Erik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]