Re: [PATCH 1/2] Added use of xmalloc() on diff-delta.c

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, 4 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> 
> These patches take that nice property away, making libification
> more difficult, which is the downside.  Is there an upside?

Well, we could just make the libification rule very simple:

 - the library does *not* include "xmalloc()", and you have to handle 
   out-of-memory situations yourself inside the xmalloc() that *you* as a 
   libification user provide!.

Then, we just make our xmalloc() be non-inlined (which we should do 
*anyway* - it's long since grown so big that it shouldn't be inlined in 
the first place), and we make it part of a non-library git object file.

Other libgit uses might end up doing something like

		..
		if (sigsetjump(buffer, 1)) {
			show_oom_message();
		..

	void *xmalloc(size_t size)
	{
		void *ret = malloc(size ? size : 1);
		if (!ret)
			siglongjmp(buffer);
		return ret;
	}

or, if they use C++ exception handling, they'd just make their own 
xmalloc() raise an exception, and have the callers catch it.

The point being that this is what you'd need to do *anyway*, and trying to 
make all the library routines return NULL or some other error case is just 
worse programming practice than just having a xmalloc() that dies by 
default but that can be overridden.

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]