On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 09:07:25AM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > On Sun, Apr 03, 2016 at 03:59:46AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 12:40 AM, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > In fact, I suspect you could replace the "GOODSIG" check as well by > > > doing something like: > > > > > > # verifying 3 tags in one invocation should be exactly like > > > # verifying the 3 separately > > > tags="fourth-signed sixth-signed seventh-signed" > > > for i in $tags; do > > > git verify-tag -v --raw $i || return 1 > > > done >expect.stdout 2>expect.stderr && > > > git verify-tag -v --raw $tags >actual.stdout 2>actual.stderr && > > > test_cmp expect.stdout actual.stdout && > > > test_cmp expect.stderr actual.stderr > > > > Hmm, does [1] suggest that using test_cmp on stderr here would be > > contraindicated? > > > > [1]: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/289077 > > It does, but I am not sure I agree with the advice in that email in the > general case (I like making "-x" work, too, but not at the cost of > making the tests harder to read and write). In this case, I suppose you > could grep for gpg raw-output on stderr, though, and compare only that. > > -Peff I just read [1], I'll take the later advice and use test_i18ngrep instead. Thanks! -Santiago. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html