Re: [PATCH 0/4] Fix relative path issues in recursive submodules.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> It took me longer than expected to fix this bug.
>>
>> It comes with a test and minor refactoring and applies on top of
>> origin/sb/submodule-helper, such that it can be merged into 2.7, 2.8 as well
>> as master.
>>
>> Patch 1 is a test which fails; it has a similar layout as the
>> real failing repository Norio Nomura pointed out, but simplified to the
>> bare essentials for reproduction of the bug.
>>
>> Patch 2&3 are not strictly necessary for fixing the isseu, but it removes
>> stupid code I wrote, so the resulting code looks a little better.
>>
>> Patch 4 fixes the issue by giving more information to relative_path,
>> such that a relative path can be found in all cases.
>
> There were some minor nits, but I saw nothing glaringly wrong to
> break the topic.  Thanks for working on this.

Thanks for review and discussion, I plan on resending this series.

Currently I have the opinion to drop 2&3 (the path assumption and
double safe_create_leading_dir) and send patch 1 and 4 combined as
a bugfix only as that is more the spirit what we want to see for
an eventual merge to maint?

The refactoring patches 2&3 can be sent later as separate patches
for master, I would think.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]