Re: [RFC PATCH] gpg: add support for gpgsm

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes:

> But maybe we could pull this out to a separate config option, like
> "commit.defaultSignatureType", which could be either "gpg", "gpgsm", or
> "auto" to enable the behavior you have here.  Then savvy users can pick
> the type they plan to use.

Yes, I think the topic should start without "auto" guessing mode
to get the basics right; guessing mode can come after we are
comfortable with the solidness of the resulting codebase.

> And regardless of the default type for creating signatures, we'd still
> automatically verify signatures from either type.

Again, true, as long as we can tell which program to use to verify,
there is no guesswork involved, and this can and should be in the
early part of the topic.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]