Re: Signed-off-by vs Reviewed-by

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On Thursday 31 March 2016 08:05 PM, Miklos Vajna wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 07:54:47PM +0530, Pranit Bauva <pranit.bauva@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Are you suggesting to use a different email address for commiting,
>> signing off and reviewing?
> Let's say project A has a workflow where patch authors and maintainers
> add a "Signed-off-by: A B <a@xxxxxxxxxxx>" line. This is well-supported
> by git, various commands have a -s option to add that line.
>
> However, if project B has a workflow where patch authors add no such
> line, and reviewers add a "Reviewed-by: A B <a@xxxxxxxxxxx>" line, then
> you have to add that line manually when you do a review.
When making the string configurable, would it be a good idea to
support more than one sign-off strings? For instance, often patches
here in Git have both a Signed-Off and a Reviewed-by line. What would
you suggest for such a case?


Regards,
Sidhant


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]